Entry # 10 Essay
Refugee policies, the advantages and disadvantages of opening the borders
According
to the United Nations, the percentage of refugees has largely increased in the
past years, right now there are 26 million refugees globally. Nearly 42% of
them were under the age of eighteen. The majority of these refugees come from
just five countries; which are Syria, Venezuela, Afghanistan, South Sudan and
Myanmar. Millions of them have been denied access to basic rights (such as
freedom, healthcare and education) and a new and safer nationality. From an
ethical point, all countries should accept refugees on their land. However, it
is not news to say that this is not the case. There are many opinions on the
fact, this is not a black or white situation. But on the whole, there are two
options, a government can be: either in
favor of accepting refugees in their country or against. In order to establish
their position on the matter, governments are going to consider a long list of
advantages and disadvantages. The key to decide on refugee policies is to
consider the disadvantages of hosting asylum seekers as problems to solve and
not as mere reasons not to accept them into the country.
In the
first place, we have the exchange of cultures; or cultures collision, if taken
as a disadvantage. There are plenty of different and rich cultures around the
world. Some of which share lots of similarities, some of which can almost be
considered opposites. It is fair to say that the cultures form occidental
countries would, most likely, blend better together and with no big
complications than with oriental cultures.
It is vital not to focus on the differences or preconceived ideas, as
some would while arguing that refugees do not share the same ideas of correct
social behaviour or that they tend to gather together in “ghettos” in a search
of preserving their ways instead of inserting themselves into their new
community. Ideas like those dismiss the enormous value the cultural exchange
could represent for everyone involved. It should be taken as an opportunity to
become more flexible and diverse. It will not only provide all the participants
a whole new perspective on their vision of the world; changing, adapting or
reinforcing their conceptions; but also increase their knowledge of the
world. To change what is considered a
disadvantage into an advantage, the government should apply tolerant and
inclusive inmigration and refugee policies.
In the
second place, there is an economic dilemma, are refugees stealing the
residents’ jobs? The more conservative
anti-refugee side will say they are. One of the reasons they will use to prove
this idea is that the arrival of refugees increases the labour demand causing
wage depression which allows low-wage competition, making refugees more
employable than native workers. All of these based on “the erroneous notion
that there is only so much work to be done and that no one can get a job
without taking one from someone else.”1 (Davidson, 2015) Nevertheless, there is
no actual proof that opening up the borders to refugees, or immigrants in
general, has a significant effect on native unemployment. “The nature of these
effects also depends on other policy choices by the host countries. More than
anything else, the economic effect of migrants and refugees is a decision.”2
(Clemens, 2017) Once refugees are incorporated into the labour market, they do
not take jobs out of the native workers’ hands but, indeed increase the size of
the economy.
In third
place, there is the healthcare issue, the question here is if refugees
represent a threat to the healthcare system of the hosting country. The
allegation is that refugees already enter the country with numerous health
necessities, due mostly to the lack of assistance in their homeland. Although
the fact that most certainly, refugees will have health difficulties and
necessities, those problems tend to be resolved or at least controlled at
asylum-camps. This means that refugees do not mean any significant harm to the
healthcare system.
The
decision of opening the borders to refugees and asylum seekers is not an easy
one, there are multiple factors to take into consideration. In spite of that,
the government's decision should not be whether to accept refugees or not, but
how to do it in a way that benefits both sides.
Referencies:
1- Davidson, A. (2015, March 24). Debunking the
Myth of the Job-Stealing Immigrant. The New York Times Magazine.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/29/magazine/debunking-the-myth-of-the-job-stealing-immigrant.html
2- Clemens,
M. (2017, August 8). The Real Economic Cost of Accepting Refugees. The New
Humanitarian.
Amnesty International. Refugees, Asylum-seekers and Migrants.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/refugees-asylum-seekers-and-migrants/
Cable, V. (2017, September 8). The Tory fallacy: that migrants are taking British jobs and driving down wages. The Guardian.
Brown, N. (2016, August 28). Are refugees stealing jobs? Magic Valley.
Indiana Department of Health. Myths about refugees.
https://www.in.gov/isdh/24670.htm
United Nations. Refugees.
https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/refugees/
The UN Refugee Agency. What is a refugee?

Comentarios
Publicar un comentario